|
Subscribe now for
the member newsletter.
Click on the link here:
|

As compelling evidence accumulates on
the medical benefits of newborn circumcision, the anti-circumcision
forces are now left only with the unsupported argument
that sex is better with a foreskin. Now, even this claim
is discredited. Recent published evidence indicates that
circumcised sex is better. A previous survey of sexually
active mid-Western women found that 75% preferred the
circumcised penis. The reasons given included improved
genital cleanliness and appearance. Interestingly, most
of the women felt a circumcised penis looked "more
natural". Similarly a report from London found that
90% of the prostitutes surveyed preferred a circumcised
penis, again because of better genital hygiene. Published
findings in the Journal of American Medical Association
(JAMA) indicated that circumcised men engage in more varied
sexual practices, and that older uncircumcised men were
likely to have diminished sex drive compared to older
circumcised men.
Within the past year 2 studies in the
Journal of Urology found that adult circumcision does
not adversely effect male sexual function. One study found
no difference in sex drive, erection, ejaculation or overall
satisfaction 12 weeks or more after adult circumcision,
while the other found that more men reported benefits
than harm from adult circumcision, and 62% were satisfied
with having been circumcised as an adult. The current
evidenced- based benefits of circumcision include protection
against kidney infections, HIV and other sexually transmitted
diseases, and penile and uterine cancer, not to mention
local penile infections, skin disorders and genital hygiene.
These documented advantages should be measured against
anecdotes and testimonials of the anti-circumcision groups
claiming the sexual advantage of the foreskin, contentions
that now have been contradicted by the medical facts.
|